In my last post I described “profaning the name of YHVH” as the gateway transgression, after which come all other transgressions. As we read about this profaning, or polluting, of the Name (which could literally be understood as YHVH’s reputation, or legacy), it’s sandwiched between Cain’s geneaology – which ends with multiple blasphemies and evils spoken by Lamech – and Seth’s geneaology – which ends with stressful words of the other Lamech, who was the father of Noah.
The former Lamech is fifth from Cain, but the latter Lamech is seventh from Seth. Thus, Cain’s ancestral line (at least, our written record of it) ends abruptly, but I believe this is completely by design.
This was recorded for our benefit, so that Mankind can be portrayed in that pre-Flood world as one “Lamech” or the other. Ever prophetically speaking to us, the Bible shows that all descendants of Adam – whether they hail from Cain’s line or Seth’s – had reached their personal breaking point of “Lamech”, for better or for worse. The former Lamech spouts off elitist and violent words, while the latter Lamech agonizes over the stress and adversity of life. There are no other quotes in either genealogy, except from these two who share a namesake.
This is no accident; both men’s words show how Mankind had shifted to two extremes – one to the uber-violent while the other became ultra-oppressed.
Adam and Eve attempted to raise their children to be righteous as Abel was righteous, by Eve’s own admission (cf. Genesis 4:25). However, just two generations later, Mankind as a whole “began to profane the name of YHVH.” Therefore the question becomes: ‘how did the descendants of Seth stray?’ By all appearances, Cain’s descendants reached the point of ‘Lamech’ within five generations, while Seth’s ancestors reached their tipping point in seven. Thus it appears that Cain’s ancestors were on a fast track to perdition, while the descendants of Seth gradually followed the influences of Cain’s descendants. This is exactly what I believe Genesis 5 shows (aside from the genealogy of Seth of course).
Anyone can spot that some of the names are common between the two geneaologies. My question is, why? I don’t believe in biblical coincidences; I think that such “coincidences” are invitations to dig deeper, so let’s shovel some ideas.
The first similarity is the name “Enoch”, which first appears as the name of Cain’s son, who became the namesake of a fortress Cain was building at the time (cf. Gen. 4:17). That must’ve been some fortress, because there’s a chance that Enoch – a descendant of Seth – was named after it. (Gen. 5:18). Now I realize that’s complete speculation, but at any rate, Enoch might’ve been named after a fortress of Cain, but he definitely didn’t go the “way of Cain” – he “walked with God, and was not, for God took him.” (Gen. 5:24).
Assuming that Enoch was named after an impressive fortress, the fact remains, Enoch broke from the trajectory the rest of his peers were headed towards. The very fact that Enoch “walked with God” is an indication that his contemporaries were not; they were more concerned with fortresses, their fields, eating and drinking, building harems, and so forth (cf. Gen. 5:28, 6:2; Matt. 24:37-38). And who was Enoch’s most famous contemporary? That’s right, it was Lamech, the violent entrepreneur in the line of Cain. (For an explanation of why Lamech was so famous, read this recent post).
Seth’s genealogy includes ages as benchmarks, and if we do the math, Enoch was still alive to see the birth of his grandson, which was a brisk 113 years before he taken. However, the name given to his grandson was “Lamech”. Thus this a hint that Enoch’s son Methusaleh was inspired by… the violent entrepreneur, even as his father was demonstrating intimacy with the One True God.
I like to imagine that God was so want of intimacy with men in those days that He literally took it where He could find it – in this case, the soul of Enoch. Clearly no one else was joining Enoch in his walk, in fact it appears that in those days Enoch’s relatives were looking to the successes of Cain’s line, as well as the other distractions mentioned by both Moses (Gen. 6:1-5) and especially Messiah Yeshua:
“As the days of Noah were, so will the coming of the Son of Man be. For as in those days which were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ship, and they didn’t know until the flood came, and took them all away…” (Matthew 24:37-39)
It wasn’t that these men were necessarily egregious in their sins. As a collective whole, mankind was certainly violent and sensuous, but in the end, they all died because “they didn’t know” (as Messiah is quoted above). They could have known, had they followed Enoch’s example, but it appears no one wanted to know except God, so God took him.
There will come a time again when we will have a chance to be taken, but if we envy successful people while ignoring their injustices done to others, or are preoccupied with entertainment, our careers, working, the opposite sex, and anything else aside from doing God’s will, we too will miss our Enoch moment, and perish like those in the Great Flood. ◊
Nice said. Be awake and follow Yeshua. He is the only way, truth and love.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That last paragraph is completely true for us in this time! Well done! Shalom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Something odd has been happening to me and I don’t really know how to explain it. I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to write and confirm that there was indeed two (2) different Enoch’s. Had it not been for your thought’s i would’ve continued to believe that I was starting to really go crazy. I am not a person who has read the bible, but I have been knowing things and seeing things that even trip my boyfriend out. He has studied different religions and know’s alot about his bible and when I tell him things Ive been seeing or the things that have popped into my head he will look up what he is not sure about and sais good job. I think im starting to freak is both out a little.
LikeLike
Hi friend, have you considered that this may be God? I said a prayer for you, I hope He will give you understanding in this life.
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing. I was wondering if you know which Enoch wrote the “Book Of Enoch”? How certain can we be of which line it came from? Cain or of Seth?
LikeLike
Ingrid, the texts of that book are traditionally attributed to the latter Enoch, the one taken. However, I would caution using modern translations – I am not sure any of those books, such as the ones that came from Ethiopia, is the same as quoted by the Apostle James.
LikeLike
We are close to our blessed hopes return ……..
LikeLike
This literally made no sense. Under Cain’s line 4 names are exactly the same as ones listed under Seth. The ONLY difference is when you get to Noah. So explain that please and thank you.
Also, could please explain that. When Cain was exiled to the land of nod why there were already people there? I mean. If Cain is the THIRD person to ever be created then ALL of those people would be younger and his siblings or nieces and nephews…oh and lets not forget that there are two of several people. So please, explain this for the classroom.
LikeLike
Hello. Yes, some of the names in Cain’s line are the same. We are not the first to notice this. I fail to see why that would demand an explanation.
Yes, Cain’s wife would have to be a sister or niece. There’s no way around that. I would advise you to be careful, though, if you say “there were already people there.” The Bible says he went to the land of Nod… but you seem to be making an assumption the land was already inhabited.
LikeLike
There was only one Enoch, one Lamech. Moses embellished the story of two separate ones so that people would not realize we’re all “descendants” of the first murderer to be caught.
I say to “to be caught” because cain says in Genesis that he is afraid the people of the world will know what he’s done and will kill him. Clearly god cares not for those other people just cain.
LikeLike
I’m failing to understand why you are insistent on this point, and I also fail to see why you’d interpret my last response as talking down to you. I can debate my interpretation of Moses but what I cannot debate is some unfounded accusation of Moses. If you don’t believe Moses, so be it, but if you’re just here to rabble-rouse then please move on.
LikeLike
ARE YOU KIDDING??? HE SAYS IN GENESIS ONE HE CREATES MAN AND FEMALE THEN IM GEN 2 HE CREATES ADAM AND EVE.
Dude learn your Bible before you try and talk down to me. You clearly are not prepared for a battle of Wits or knowledge. You are unarmed and ill informed. I suggest you go back to sunday scknohool
LikeLike
School**
Sorry, i got over zealous
LikeLike