The Scriptures make a big deal about the talking serpent, because God is trying to teach us something. However, if this story is unsettling to you, I recommend this primer here.
Setting the scene, God initially requires an explanation from Adam, but Adam plays “The Blame Game”. Adam blames his wife (although he blames God more!), who in turn blames the serpent. Yet the serpent was unable to ‘pass the buck’… because it was already cursed, and lost its ability to speak.
And YHVH Elohim said to the serpent, “Because you made this, you are cursed more than all the livestock, and every beast of the field. Over your belly will you go, and dust will you eat every day of your life. And I will place hostility between you and between the woman, and between your seed and between her seed. He will strike your head, and you will strike his heel. (Genesis 3:14-15)
Christians teach that the serpent is ‘Satan’, citing other obscure scriptures as justification, but I think it’s an incorrect assumption. There is no solid biblical evidence that the serpent was possessed, or otherwise was one-in-the-same as ha-shatan (“the accuser”). Now, I do believe that ha-shatan was implicated somehow, because “from the Beginning the Adversary has kept on sinning” (1 John 3:8). But for whatever reason, we aren’t given the accuser’s role; it remains a mystery. However, emphatically teaching “the serpent is Satan!” distracts us from this passage’s intent. The following attempts to explain my position.
First of all, the phrase “cursed from all cattle…” says that the serpent was cursed from all other animals, as it would become “the adder in the way”. Additionally, Mankind would forever have a specialized hostility to them, unlike how the majority of us humanely treat our pets, livestock, and wildlife.
The same phrase (because you made this, you are cursed more than…) is constructed similar to Genesis 3:1 — “the serpent was clever, more than any beast of the field which YHVH Elohim had made.” This is by design. Both phrases feature the verb asah (to make), and compare the serpent to other wild animals. Combined, the two teach a lesson: God made the serpent within a “good” creation (cf. Gen 1:31). But God’s reward for making it? The serpent makes something of its own… mischief!
We must remember that the talking serpent, like its Hebrew nachash name implies – was a “divining” false prophet figure which claimed “God knows” such and such (cf. Gen. 3:5), who deceptively convinced men to question and transgress the law of God.
This is an important lesson, because as a result of the Fall, we became just like serpents (gaining cleverness, deceptiveness, etc.). Now, anyone can be a false prophet or teacher! So if this serpent “made” a deception, we can also “make” deceptions of our accord. Or, we can choose to make righteousness in the earth –love, peace, charity, etc. Whatever we choose, we the Creation are sub-creating something. Let’s be sure we’re making acts that last for eternity.
With a curse God put the serpent beneath us once again, but the serpent did NOT lose its ability to walk, as many have claimed. It was created slithering, just as Chavah was created to bear children to “fill the earth” (cf. Gen. 1:28, 3:16), and just as Adam was made to till the ground (cf. Gen. 2:15, 3:17-18). When God judges all three parties, He’s reminding each guilty party of what they really are (slitherers, mothers, and “dust”). Let’s remember that Adam and Chavah wanted to be gods on par with YHVH Elohim. Now, when a woman has labor pains – pains that could claim her own life – she remembers that she is NOT a god. When men pour blood sweat and tears into labors, knowing that all it leads to us death, he remembers that he is NOT a god.
So there IS a reason God specifically tells the serpent the obvious: “over your belly will you go, and dust will you eat.” Without its deceptive words, the serpent is NOTHING. It is a literal “low life” that always has its body and tongue in the dirt. And God ensures that Mankind would never be its prey again.
Comparatively speaking, if you took away the words of a false prophet, what do you have?
Someone who is also moved by his “belly”:
I urge you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put snares alongside the teaching in which you have been trained — keep away from them. For men like these are not serving our Lord the Messiah but their own belly… (Romans 16:17-18a)
And consumes the “dust”:
… by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the simple. (Romans 16:18b)
God said in the Scriptures that we would always have “hostility” with serpents. We ought to have the same in regards to the false prophets and teachers, as Rav Shaul (Paul) says: “keep away from them!” Like serpents, wherever they go, so does their belly. They move from congregation to congregation, seeking material things like your money and seat of authority. Like serpents, they are smooth talkers and deceivers, and they want to consume the “dust” – us! For dust we are, and to dust we shall return (cf. Gen. 3:19).
However, false prophets are no match for the Power and authority of Messiah Yeshua. Yeshua said that we would “take up serpents” – and he wasn’t talking about us judo-chopping snakes with garden rakes. He was talking about facing the false prophets of the world! The best that natural snakes can do is yip at our heels, but we have the power to lop off its head. The same rule applies in a spiritual environment. The false prophets will target our “heels” – meaning those among us most ignorant and susceptible to deception – but we have a mandate to face these soothsayers, and to rebuke their leaders (their “heads”). We must expose them for being moved by their bellies (by their works will you know them), and not by the Spirit of YHVH Elohim.
Somewhere in the world, there is a snake ready to startle an unsuspecting gardener. Somewhere else in the world, there is a false prophet deceiving the ignorant. There is no way to rectify either situation without hostility and confrontation. It’s simply been the way of the world since Genesis.
I’m not familiar with this particular method of interpretation employed here. Is this purely from your own translation work or does it come from some other tradition?
The bulk of this interpretation hinges on the assertion that all animals were created with the ability to speak and all lost that ability in the curse of the serpent. That notion hinges on the root of “behemah” indicating mute. That brings 2 questions. First, are the large animals so named because they were “muted” in the fall, or because a characteristic of their creation was the inability to speak? Behemah is used in the creation narrative, before the fall, and all of the animals were named by Adam before the fall. If Behemah is to indicate that their speech had been muted, why was there no name change, or an indication of such a drastic curse extending to all manner of beast. Also, the enmity between mankind and beasts (chay) doesn’t truly come into play until after the flood, right (Gen. 9)? If the point of the enmity was intended to highlight the extra punishment of serpents, then later having the rest of the beasts now fear mankind seems to level out the playing field, so to speak. As for Bilaam’s donkey having had its mouth opened, I think it is a stretch to assume that only what was once open and had been closed can then be “opened”. Even if the donkey never had the ability to speak in the garden, God granting speech to the donkey to warn/rebuke Bilaam would accurately be described as God opening the mouth of the donkey.
I think the ability to speak was integral to what made this serpent “more crafty” than any of the other beasts of the field. I think the language here is that it was granted a special place in creation (below man). I cannot prove it was only a singular hissing animal with speech… it could be that all hissing beasts were craftier than the mute ones. That is why I don’t try to hang my hat on what isn’t specified, and hold onto the fact that in the curse against this serpent (who had tempted mankind to sin against God) we see the first promise of the Messiah, the seed of woman whose heel would be bruised by the serpent, but He would crush the head of the Serpent. This is the early Gospel of the Messiah who would come.
I agree with your connection of the serpent to false teachers, for that is indeed what John the Baptists called the false teachers who came out to him, “a brood of vipers”. There are many other such connections drawn in the new testament.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for visiting my blog and commenting. I appreciate the feedback, even if we have a difference of opinions.
My goal has always been to throw out what every one else interprets, and follow the texts and clues for myself. So if it’s on my blog, it’s my own interpretation. However, my blog should be read as a question, not as an emphatic assertion.
I do see your point about the behemah. You may be pleased to know that I’m going to rewrite that portion, thank you.
Coincidentally, there were two ways to interpret that particular verse “arar atah min kol habehemot”, and if you compare the translations, you will see that the writers are split between two thoughts. In retrospect, I should have chosen “you are cursed from all behemot, and every beast of the field.” In other words, the serpent became an “adder in the way” of both beasts and men.
There are thousands of Messianic prophecies, but this is not one of them. No one ever thought the serpent was satan until it started showing up in Christian commentaries. I find it hard to believe this could be a Messianic prophecy, when not one apostle used it.
Furthermore, there are linguistic problems with that stand. Did satan spawn seed? Are there more satans? but there are many seeds of women, and many seeds of serpents.
Again, thank you for the input. It did change my thinking of that particular verse I mentioned.
LikeLiked by 1 person